Clinical evaluation of community pharmacists' interventions

Author:

Caleo Sue1,Benrimoj Shalom1,Collins David2,Lauchlan Roberta3,Stewart Kay4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales

2. Department of Pharmacy, University of Queensland

3. Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney

4. Victorian College of Pharmacy Practice, Monash University, Melbourne

Abstract

Abstract Pharmacists' clinical interventions with prescriptions listed on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme were investigated in a pilot study set up in 30 pharmacies — 10 each from the states of New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria — stratified by city or rural location. Clinical interventions were self-reported by the 29 participating pharmacies for a period of four weeks. A total of 89,326 prescription items was dispensed in the pharmacies over the 675 recording days. There were 1,273 clinical interventions recorded from 1,053 prescription forms. Clinical interventions were divided into two main categories: reactive and proactive. The mean of the total clinical intervention rate was 1.5 per cent (SD=1.4 per cent), comprising 1.2 per cent (SD=1.2 per cent) reactive interventions and 0.3 per cent (SD=0.3 per cent) proactive interventions. A random sample of 50 proactive interventions that resulted in a change in a patient's therapy was evaluated by a clinical expert panel to determine the most likely adverse outcome avoided as a result of the pharmacist's intervention. This study provides evidence of community pharmacists' interventions with prescriptions and demonstrates that pharmacists increase the efficiency and effectiveness of patients' drug regimens and also, potentially, their welfare and quality of life.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference17 articles.

1. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care;Hepler;Am J Pharm Educ,1989

2. Drug-related deaths among medical inpatients;Porter;JAMA,1977

3. Drug-related emergency department visits and hospital admissions;Prince;Am J Hosp Pharm,1992

4. Drug-related morbidity and mortality: a cost-of-illness model;Johnson;Arch Intern Med,1995

5. Polypharmacy in the elderly: a fait compli;Stewart;Drug Intell Clin Pharm,1990

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3