Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmacology, Materia Medica and Therapeutics, Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
Abstract
Abstract
The effects of phenylpropanolamine on motor activity and on food intake were compared with those of S-amphetamine, ephedrine, 2-aminoindane and fenfluramine in groups of mice. Motor activity was additionally measured in mice pretreated with levodopa and benserazide, and food intake in mice pretreated with α-methyl-p-tyrosine. Amphetamine (2·5 mg kg−1) increased motor activity, phenylpropanolamine (10–40 mg kg−1) and 2-aminoindane (2·5–10 mg kg−1) decreased activity whilst ephedrine (2·5–40 mg kg−1) had a biphasic effect. Fenfluramine (10–40 mg kg−1) had negligible effect on activity. In mice pretreated with levodopa and benserazide both phenylpropanolamine and 2-aminoindane caused a massive increase in motor activity whilst fenfluramine’s action was not affected in the same way. Whilst the anorectic action of fenfluramine was considerably potentiated in mice pretreated with α-methyl-p-tyrosine, that of amphetamine, ephedrine, 2-aminoindane and phenylpropanolamine was either unaffected or initially antagonized. It is concluded that the mechanisms of motor and anorectic actions of phenylpropanolamine are similar to those of amphetamine.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献