Changing medication: general practitioner and patient perspectives

Author:

Wood Kay M1,Boath Elizabeth H1,Mucklow John C1,Blenkinsopp Alison1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicines Management, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire

Abstract

Abstract This study, carried out in one fundholding general practice with 9,680 patients, assessed the acceptability to patients and general practitioners of three types of prescribing changes to repeat medication: generic substitution, therapeutic substitution, and changing delivery device. Patients' opinions were sought via a postal questionnaire, face-to-face semi-structured interviews and telephone interviews. Prescribers' views were sought via face-to-face interviews with five GPs and an asthma clinic doctor. The interviews assessed the acceptability of the changes to the patients, and the attitudes of prescribers towards identifying the need for change and carrying it out. Of 78 patients who returned the postal questionnaire following a change from branded to generic medicine, 14 (18 per cent) were “happy” with the change, 48 (62 per cent) were “not bothered” and 12 (15 per cent) were “unhappy” (four did not answer the question). Of 25 patients, interviewed face-to-face, whose prescription for ranitidine had been changed to cimetidine, 21 (84 per cent) were not concerned about the change. Of 15 patients, interviewed by telephone, who were asked to change their asthma delivery device, eight had refused to be changed, one had reverted back and the remaining six were happy with their new delivery device. Interviews with the prescribers showed that they had expected a higher level of resistance and complaints from patients than had proved to be the case. Simple changes to patients' repeat medication are feasible and have a high level of acceptance provided the proposed change is appropriately communicated to the patient.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference29 articles.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3