The use of serial point-prevalence studies to investigate hospital anti-infective prescribing

Author:

Dean Bryony1,Lawson Wendy1,Jacklin Ann2,Rogers Tom1,Azadian Berge1,Holmes Alison2

Affiliation:

1. Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Du Cane Road, London, England W12 0HS

2. Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To develop and test an efficient, reproducible method for the surveillance of hospital anti-infective use; to use this method to investigate patterns of anti-infective prescribing. Method A series of three standardised point-prevalence studies were carried out in which pharmacists recorded details of all inpatients prescribed systemic anti-infectives. Time taken to collect, enter and analyse these data was documented. Parameters examined included: percentage of patients prescribed anti-infectives, percentage of anti-infectives that were for “reserved” use, percentage of these with appropriate approval, percentage of anti-infectives administered intravenously, duration of therapy, and combinations of anti-infectives used. Setting All hospital inpatients in a large National Health Service (NHS) Trust comprising four sites. Key findings For each study, an estimated 35 additional hours of pharmacists' time was required for data collection, cleaning and analysis, and 15 hours for data entry. The method developed was easily reproducible and results from the three studies were very similar. Overall, 33 per cent of 2,656 inpatients were prescribed at least one anti-infective (mean 1.7 per patient); 48 per cent of anti-infectives were given intravenously (IV), of which 34 per cent could have been given orally. Of the anti-infectives used, 21 per cent were for “reserved” use. Of these, 65 per cent were used for an approved indication, and 11 per cent were not. The remaining 24 per cent had no indication documented in the medical notes. Conclusion This is a practical method for studying hospital anti-infective use in the absence of computerised prescribing. The database produced provides a wealth of information and various targets for intervention have been identified; these can now be evaluated against the baseline data collected. The methods developed could be used in other hospitals to provide benchmarking data.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference13 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3