Do researchers use pharmacists' communication as an outcome measure? A scoping review of pharmacist involvement in diabetes care

Author:

Babinec Patricia M1,Rock Melanie J2345,Lorenzetti Diane L36,Johnson Jeffrey A7

Affiliation:

1. Graduate Division of Educational Research, Faculty of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

2. Population Health Intervention Research Centre, Calgary, Canada

3. Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

4. Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

5. Calgary Institute of Population and Public Health, Calgary, Canada

6. Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Canada

7. Canada School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Pharmacy practice increasingly revolves around obtaining and interpreting information. We investigated whether and how pharmacy practice researchers design their studies in ways that acknowledge verbal communication between pharmacists and patients with diabetes. Methods We conducted a scoping review of pharmacists' interventions with patients previously diagnosed as having diabetes with the aim of assessing how many used communication (quality and quantity) as an outcome measure. A scoping review identifies gaps in the literature and draws conclusions regarding the overall state of a research programme, but does not necessarily identify gaps in the quality of the studies reviewed. Quality assessment, therefore, was not conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched from 2003 to 2008 to identify relevant studies published in English. Reference lists of key studies were also scanned to identify additional studies. Randomized controlled trials and related studies of pharmacists verbal communication with diabetic patients were included. Key findings Some 413 abstracts were identified through database and reference searching. Of these, 65 studies met abstract inclusion criteria and 16 studies met full-text inclusion criteria necessary for this review. The majority of included studies report on patients' health outcomes, beliefs about drugs, self-reported health-related quality-of-life scales or some combination of these measures as indicators of pharmacists' interventions. Nine studies included information on the duration of the initial interaction between pharmacists and patients with diabetes; 13 reported on the number of follow-up contacts with pharmacists, and seven studies indicated that pharmacists participating in interventions had received training in diabetes management or in patient-centred care. No studies included or evaluated transcripts of pharmacist–patient interactions. Summary Results reveal a gap in the existing literature. In studies of diabetes, pharmacy practice researchers do not appear to consider the influence of pharmacists' communication skills on health outcomes. Future studies should be designed to incorporate a communication research component.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacy

Reference59 articles.

1. Responding to change: the case of community pharmacy in Great Britain;Harding;Sociol Health Illn,1997

2. The role of the chemist in primary health care for children with minor complaints;Cunningham-Burley;Soc Sci Med,1987

3. Pharmaceutical care: past, present and future;Berenguer;Curr Pharm Des,2004

4. The impact of pharmaceutical services in community and ambulatory care settings: evidence and recommendations for future research;Singhai;Ann Pharmacother,1999

5. Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 Canadian Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada;Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee;Can J Diabetes,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3