Affiliation:
1. Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThere have been no comparative bioavailability studies between the microemulsified ciclosporin formulation, approved for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (cAD), and the generic modified formulation of ciclosporin for humans.ObjectivesTo compare whole blood ciclosporin concentrations of oral generic modified ciclosporin (Treatment A; Teva Pharmaceuticals) and ciclosporin brand Atopica (Treatment B; Elanco Animal Health) in healthy dogs at 1 and 1.5 h following a single oral administration.MethodsWhole blood concentrations were evaluated at 1 and 1.5 h post‐oral administration of treatments A and B in a randomised, blinded, cross‐over study with an 8‐day wash‐out, after a single administration at 4.4–5.3 mg/kg/day in eight healthy, male‐castrated research beagle dogs. Ciclosporin blood concentrations were measured through the Auburn University Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory.ResultsCiclosporin blood concentrations were below the detection limit before the start of treatment for both groups. Blood ciclosporin concentrations for Treatment A (median 1192 ng/ml) were significantly higher at 1 h post‐oral administration than those for Treatment B (median 499 ng/ml; p = 0.001). However, no significant differences (p = 0.75) in ciclosporin values were observed at 1.5 h post‐administration between treatments A (median 945 ng/ml) and B (median 809 ng/ml).Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceGeneric modified ciclosporin achieved higher blood concentrations at 1 h post‐administration than Atopica after a single oral administration in healthy dogs; no difference was noted at 1.5 h. Further clinical studies using generic modified ciclosporin in client‐owned dogs affected with cAD are advocated to confirm its therapeutic efficacy.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献