Academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice: A theory‐guided scoping review

Author:

Halili Xirongguli1ORCID,Xia Yuting1ORCID,Li Zeen1ORCID,Tang Siyuan12ORCID,Wang Honghong12ORCID,Chen Qirong12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Xiangya School of Nursing Central South University Changsha China

2. Xiangya Center for Evidence‐Based Nursing Practice & Healthcare Innovation A JBI Centre of Excellence Changsha China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcademic–practice partnerships have the potential to solve many challenges in evidence‐based nursing practice which is crucial for high‐quality care.AimsTo identify the existing knowledge on academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice.MethodsWe conducted this review following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. We performed a comprehensive literature search of nine databases as well as five websites for gray literature. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening and data extraction and analysis. A third researcher was involved when needed.ResultsDedicated time, dedicated resources, and compatible goals were found to be the top three inputs in academic–practice partnerships for evidence‐based nursing practice. Meeting and discussion were the most popular forms of activities. Sufficient resources were the most important facilitators. Insufficient resources, insufficient time, and communication issues were the top three barriers.ConclusionsThe assumption proposed in the practice–academic partnership logic model (i.e., inputs plus activities can lead to outputs and outcomes) was preliminarily verified by the results of this review in the context of evidence‐based nursing practice. Academic–practice partnerships can leverage the advantages of both sides to overcome barriers and promote evidence‐based nursing practice. However, it is essential to conduct a broader range of high‐quality studies. Such endeavors could offer more comprehensive evidence for refining the framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice.Implications for nursing education, practice, policy and researchThe “theoretical framework of academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice” could theoretically guide academic and clinical nursing staff to collaborate on evidence‐based nursing practice and related research and education programs. The academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice could lead to a win‐win situation for both the academic and the clinical sides. Furthermore, the results of this study provide an evidence‐based foundation for policymakers to develop supportive policies for academic–practice partnerships in evidence‐based nursing practice.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province

Publisher

Wiley

Reference62 articles.

1. Fostering Academic-Clinical Research Partnerships

2. Patient Safety Training Programs for Health Care Professionals: A Scoping Review

3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2012)Guiding principles for academic‐practice partnerships.https://www.aacnnursing.org/Academic‐Practice‐Partnerships/The‐Guiding‐Principles

4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016)Advancing healthcare transformation: a new era for academic nursing.https://www.manatt.com/insights/white‐papers/2016/advancing‐healthcare‐transformation‐a‐new‐era‐fo

5. Approaches for establishing and sustaining clinical academic partnerships: A discursive review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3