Albumin administration in septic shock—Protocol for post‐hoc analyses of data from a multicentre RCT

Author:

Meyhoff Tine Sylvest12ORCID,Granholm Anders12ORCID,Hjortrup Peter Buhl23,Sivapalan Praleene12ORCID,Lange Theis24,Laake Jon Henrik5ORCID,Cronhjort Maria6,Jakob Stephan M.7,Cecconi Maurizio89,Nalos Marek10,Ostermann Marlies11,Malbrain Manu L. N. G.1213,Møller Morten Hylander12,Perner Anders12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

2. Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC) Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

4. Department of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rikshospitalet Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

7. Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Bern (Inselspital), University of Bern Bern Switzerland

8. Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy

9. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy

10. Medical Intensive Care Unit, 1. Interni klinika Fakultni Nemocnice Plzen Czech Republic

11. Department of Intensive Care Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK

12. Department of Intensive Care Medicine University Hospital Brussels (UZB) Jette Belgium

13. First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIntravenous (IV) albumin is suggested for patients with septic shock who have received large amounts of IV crystalloids; a conditional recommendation based on moderate certainty of evidence. Clinical variation in the administration of IV albumin in septic shock may exist according to patient characteristics and location.MethodsThis is a protocol and statistical analysis plan for a post‐hoc secondary study of the Conservative versus Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) RCT of 1554 adult ICU patients with septic shock. We will assess if specific baseline characteristics or trial site are associated with the administration of IV albumin during ICU stay using Cox models with competing events. All models will be adjusted for the treatment allocation in CLASSIC (restrictive vs. standard IV fluid), and all analyses will consider competing events (death, ICU discharge and loss‐to‐follow‐up). We will present results as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals and p‐values for the associations of baseline characteristics or site with IV albumin administration. Between‐group differences (interactions) will be assessed using p‐values from likelihood ratio tests. All results will be considered exploratory only.DiscussionThis secondary study of the CLASSIC RCT may yield important insight into potential practice variation in the administration of albumin in septic shock.

Funder

Novo Nordisk Fonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3