Labour analgesia by single shot spinal for any parturient?—A retrospective one‐year single centre audit

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSingle shot spinal (SSS) provides effective analgesia for multiparous parturients during advanced labour. Its utility in early labour or primiparous parturients may be limited by the insufficient duration of action. Regardless, SSS may offer a reasonable labour analgesia option in certain clinical scenarios. In this retrospective study, we analyse the failure rate of SSS analgesia by assessing pain after the SSS and by determining the need for additional analgesic interventions in primiparous or early‐stage multiparous parturients compared to multiparous parturients in advanced labour (cervix ≥6 cm).MethodsFollowing institutional ethical board approval, the patient files of all parturients receiving SSS analgesia during a 12‐month period in a single centre were analysed for any recorded notes regarding recurrent pain or subsequent analgesia interventions (a new SSS, epidural, pudendal or paracervical bloc) as a marker for insufficient analgesia.ResultsA total of 88 primiparous and 447 multiparous parturients (cervix <6 cm: N = 131; cervix ≥6 cm: N = 316) received SSS analgesia. The odds ratio for the insufficient duration of analgesia was 1.94 (1.08–3.48) in primiparous and 2.08 (1.25–3.46) in early‐stage multiparous parturients compared to advanced multiparous labour (p < .01). Primiparous and early‐stage multiparous parturients were also 2.20 (1.15–4.20) and 2.61 (1.50–4.55) times more likely, respectively, to receive new peripheral and/or neuraxial analgesic interventions during delivery (p < .01).ConclusionsSSS appears to provide adequate labour analgesia for the majority of parturients in whom it is used, including nulliparous and early‐stage multiparous parturients. It remains a reasonable option in certain clinical scenarios, including resource‐limited settings where epidural analgesia is unavailable.