Discharge instruction comprehension by older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Haimovich Adrian D.1ORCID,Mulqueen Sydney1,Carreras‐Tartak Jossie1,Gettel Cameron2ORCID,Schonberg Mara A.3,Hastings Susan N.4567,Carpenter Christopher8ORCID,Liu Shan W.9ORCID,Thomas Stephen H.110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. ADAPT Center of Innovation Durham VA Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA

5. Departments of Medicine and Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

6. Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development Duke University Durham North Carolina USA

7. Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center Durham VA Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA

8. Department of Emergency Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

10. Blizard Institute, Barts & The London School of Medicine London UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionOlder adults are at high risk of adverse health outcomes in the post–emergency department (ED) discharge period. Prior work has shown that discharged older adults have variable understanding of their discharge instructions which may contribute to these outcomes. To identify discharge comprehension gaps amenable to future interventions, we utilize meta‐analysis to determine patient comprehension across five domains of discharge instructions: diagnosis, medications, self‐care, routine follow‐up, and return precautions.MethodsUsing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, two reviewers sourced evidence from databases including Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar (for gray literature). Publications or preprints appearing before April 2024 were included if they focused on geriatric ED discharge instructions and reported a proportion of patients with comprehension of at least one of five predefined discharge components. Meta‐analysis of eligible studies for each component was executed using random‐effects modeling to describe the proportion of geriatric ED cases understanding the discharge instructions; where appropriate we calculated pooled estimates, reported as percentages with 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsOf initial records returned (N = 2898), exclusions based on title or abstract assessment left 51 studies for full‐text review; of these, seven constituted the study set. Acceptable heterogeneity and absence of indication of publication bias supported pooled estimates for proportions comprehending instructions on medications (41%, 95% CI 31%–50%, I2 = 43%), self‐care (81%, 95% CI 76%–85%, I2 = 43%), and routine follow‐up (76%, 95% CI 72%–79%, I2 = 25%). Key findings included marked heterogeneity with respect to comprehending two discharge parameters: diagnosis (I2 = 73%) and return precautions (I2 = 95%).ConclusionsOlder patients discharged from the ED had greater comprehension of self‐care and follow‐up instructions than about their medications. These findings suggest that medication instructions may be a priority domain for future interventions.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. CairnsCKK.National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2021 Emergency Department Summary Tables.2021. Accessed 1 May 2024. https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NHAMCS/doc21‐ed‐508.pdf

2. Ambulatory Follow-up and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries After Emergency Department Discharge

3. Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines

4. Patient Discharge Instructions in the Emergency Department and Their Effects on Comprehension and Recall of Discharge Instructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3