Systematic assessment of non‐medical use of prescription drugs using doctor‐shopping indicators: A nation‐wide, repeated cross‐sectional study

Author:

Soeiro Thomas123ORCID,Pradel Vincent3ORCID,Lapeyre‐Mestre Maryse45ORCID,Micallef Joëlle123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aix‐Marseille Université, Inserm Marseille France

2. Unité de pharmacoépidémiologie, Service de pharmacologie clinique Hôpitaux universitaires de Marseille Marseille France

3. Centre d'évaluation et d'information sur la pharmacodépendance—Addictovigilance, Service de pharmacologie clinique Hôpitaux universitaires de Marseille Marseille France

4. Université de Toulouse, Inserm Toulouse France

5. Centre d'évaluation et d'information sur la pharmacodépendance—Addictovigilance, Service de pharmacologie clinique, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Toulouse Toulouse France

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe aim of this study was to present the first nation‐wide, systematic, repeated assessment of doctor‐shopping (i.e. visiting multiple physicians to be prescribed the same drug) during 10 years for more than 200 psychoactive prescription drugs in the 67 million inhabitants in France.DesignThis was a nation‐wide, repeated cross‐sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsData are from the French National Health Data System in 2010, 2015 and 2019 for 214 psychoactive prescription drugs (i.e. anaesthetics, analgesics, antiepileptics, anti‐Parkinson drugs, psycholeptics, psychoanaleptics, other nervous system drugs and antihistamines for systemic use).MeasurementsThe detection and quantification of doctor‐shopping relied upon an algorithm that detects overlapping prescriptions from repeated visits to different physicians. We used two doctor‐shopping indicators aggregated at population level for each drug dispensed to more than 5000 patients: (i) the quantity doctor‐shopped, expressed in defined daily doses (DDD), which measures the total quantity doctor‐shopped by the study population for a given drug; and (ii) the proportion doctor‐shopped, expressed as a percentage, which standardizes the quantity doctor‐shopped according to the use level of the drug.FindingsThe analyses included approximately 200 million dispensings to approximately 30 million patients each year. Opioids (e.g. buprenorphine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl), benzodiazepines and non‐benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z‐drugs) (e.g. diazepam, oxazepam, zolpidem and clonazepam) had the highest proportions doctor‐shopped during the study period. In most cases, the proportion and the quantity doctor‐shopped increased for opioids and decreased for benzodiazepines and Z‐drugs. Pregabalin had the sharpest increase in the proportion doctor‐shopped (from 0.28 to 1.40%), in parallel with a sharp increase in the quantity doctor‐shopped (+843%, from 0.7 to 6.6 DDD/100 000 inhabitants/day). Oxycodone had the sharpest increase in the quantity doctor‐shopped (+1000%, from 0.1 to 1.1 DDD/100 000 inhabitants/day), in parallel with a sharp increase in the proportion doctor‐shopped (from 0.71 to 1.41%). Detailed results for all drugs during the study period can be explored interactively at: https://soeiro.gitlab.io/megadose/.ConclusionsIn France, doctor‐shopping occurs for many drugs from many pharmacological classes, and mainly involves opioid maintenance drugs, some opioids analgesics, some benzodiazepines and Z‐drugs and pregabalin.

Funder

Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3