Ghostbusting—Reducing bias due to identification errors in spatial capture‐recapture histories

Author:

Kodi Abinand Reddy1ORCID,Howard Jasmin1,Borchers David Louis12ORCID,Worthington Hannah1ORCID,Alexander Justine Shanti3,Lkhagvajav Purevjav4,Bayandonoi Gantulga5,Ochirjav Munkhtogtokh5,Erdenebaatar Sergelen5,Byambasuren Choidogjamts4,Battulga Nyamzav5,Johansson Örjan36ORCID,Sharma Koustubh3

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews St Andrews UK

2. Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch South Africa

3. Snow Leopard Trust Seattle Washington USA

4. Snow Leopard Conservation Foundation Ulaanbaatar Mongolia

5. World Wide Fund for Nature–Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia

6. Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Riddarhyttan Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Identifying individuals is key to estimating population sizes by spatial capture–recapture, but identification errors are sometimes made. The most common identification error is the failure to recognise a previously detected individual, thus creating a ‘ghost’ Johansson. This results in positively biased abundance estimates. Ghosts typically manifest as single detection individuals (‘singletons’) in the capture history. To deal with ghosts, we develop a spatial capture–recapture method conditioned on at least detections. The standard spatial capture–recapture (SCR) model is the special case of . Ghosts can mostly be excluded by fitting a model with (SCR‐2). We investigated the effect of ‘singleton’ ghosts on the estimation of the model parameters by simulation. The SCR method increasingly overestimated abundance with increasing percentage of ghosts, with positive bias even when only 10% of the detected individuals were ghosts, and bias between 43% and 71% when 30% were ghosts. Estimates from the SCR‐2 method showed lower bias in the presence of ghosts, at the cost of a loss of precision. The mean squared error of the estimated abundance from the SCR‐2 method was lower in all scenarios with ghosts under high encounter rates and for scenarios with 30% or more ghosts with low encounter rates. We also applied our method to capture histories from camera trap surveys of snow leopards (Panthera uncia) at two sites from Mongolia and find that the SCR method produced higher abundance estimates at both sites. Capture histories are susceptible to errors when generated from passive detectors such as camera traps and genetic samples. The SCR‐2 method can remove bias from ghost capture histories, at the cost of some loss in precision. We recommend using the SCR‐2 method in cases when there may be more than 10% ghosts or surveys with a large number of single detection capture histories, except perhaps when the sample size is very low.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3