Cyclic loading failed to promote growth in a pig model of midfacial hypoplasia

Abstract

AbstractYucatan miniature pigs, often used as large animal models in clinical research, are distinguished by a breed‐specific midfacial hypoplasia with anterior crossbite. Although this deformity can be corrected by distraction osteogenesis, a less invasive method is desirable. We chose a mechanical cyclic stimulation protocol that has been successful in enhancing sutural growth in small animals and in a pilot study on standard pigs. Yucatan minipigs (n = 14) were obtained in pairs, with one of each pair randomly assigned to sham or loaded groups. All animals had loading implants installed on the right nasal and frontal bones and received labels for cell proliferation and mineral apposition. After a week of healing and under anesthesia, experimental animals received cyclic tensile loads (2.5 Hz, 30 min) delivered to the right nasofrontal suture daily for 5 days. Sutural strains were recorded at the final session for experimental animals. Sham animals received the same treatment except without loading or strain gauge placement. In contrast to pilot results on standard pigs, the treatment did not produce the expected sutural widening and increased growth. Although sutures were not fused and strains were in the normal range, the targeted right nasofrontal suture was narrowed rather than widened, with no statistically significant changes in sutural cell proliferation, mineral apposition, or vascularity. In general, Yucatan minipig sutures were more vascular than those of standard pigs and also tended to have more proliferating cells. In conclusion, either because the sutures themselves are abnormal or because of growth restrictions elsewhere in the skull, this cyclic loading protocol was unable to produce the desired response of sutural widening and growth. This treatment, effective in normal animals, did not improve naturally occurring midfacial hypoplasia in Yucatan minipigs.