Locations of COVID‐19 vaccination provision: Urban‐rural differences

Author:

Ryan Grace W.1ORCID,Kahl Amanda R.23,Callaghan Don4,Kintigh Bethany4,Askelson Natoshia M.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

2. Department of Epidemiology University of Iowa College of Public Health Iowa City Iowa USA

3. Iowa Cancer Registry University of Iowa College of Public Health Iowa City Iowa USA

4. Bureau of Immunization & TB Iowa Health and Human Services Des Moines Iowa USA

5. Department of Community and Behavioral Health University of Iowa College of Public Health Iowa City Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeOur goal was to compare locations of COVID‐19 vaccine provision in urban and rural communities over the course of the pandemic.MethodsWe used the Iowa Immunization Registry Information System (IRIS) to identify the organizations providing COVID‐19 vaccines (eg, pharmacies, public health departments, and medical providers). Proportions of first‐dose vaccines by organization type and patient census‐based statistical area were generated. We calculated Chi‐square tests to assess differences among metropolitan, micropolitan, and noncore communities.FindingsIRIS data revealed that 64% (n = 2,043,251) of Iowans received their first COVID‐19 vaccine between December 14, 2020, and December 31, 2022. For metropolitan‐dwelling individuals, most first doses were administered at pharmacies (53%), with similar trends observed for micropolitan (49%) and noncore (42%) individuals. The second most common location for metropolitan individuals was medical practices (17%); public health clinics and departments were the second most common provider for micropolitan (26%) and noncore (33%) individuals. These trends shifted over time. In December 2020, hospitals were the most common vaccine provider for everyone, but by December 2022, medical providers were the most common source for metropolitan individuals, and pharmacies were most common for micropolitan and noncore individuals.ConclusionsTrends in the type of vaccine provider differentiated metropolitan residents from micropolitan and noncore residents. For the latter groups, local public health departments played a more significant role. Across all groups, pharmacists emerged as a critical vaccine provider. Our findings can be used to plan for seasonal vaccine campaigns as well as potential future mass vaccination campaigns.

Funder

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference24 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CDC. Accessed October 18 2023.https://covid.cdc.gov/covid‐data‐tracker/#vaccination‐states‐jurisdictions

2. COVID‐19 Pandemic Vaccination Planning: Update for State and Local Public Health Programs. 2020.

3. Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Between Urban and Rural Counties — United States, December 14, 2020–April 10, 2021

4. Health Equity in Midsize Rural Communities: Challenges and Opportunities in a Changing Rural America

5. Rural‐urban and within‐rural differences in COVID‐19 vaccination rates

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3