EFFICACY OF RAMIPRIL VERSUS ENALAPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION

Author:

Yasky J1,Verho M2,Erasmus TP3,Luus HG3,Angela M1,Grandin L1,Akbary MA2,Rangoonwala B2

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Medicina Interna Universidad Nacional de Cuyo Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Mendoza Argentina

2. Hoechst AG Clinical Research Frankfurt

3. Division of Biometry FARMOVS Research Centre University of the Orange Free State Bloemfontein South Africa

Abstract

SUMMARY This double‐blind, randomised, cross‐over study investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril and enalapril was completed by 30 patients with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension. After a four‐week placebo run‐in phase, the patients received either 2.5mg ramipril or 10mg enalapril once daily for four weeks. The dosages were increased to 5mg ramipril and 20mg enalapril for a further four weeks. After a placebo washout phase of four weeks, the patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment. The decrease in average 24‐hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure from week 0 to week 8 was 1.6mmHg greater with ramipril than enalapril (90% confidence interval 0.6‐2.7mmHg). The corresponding reduction in for systolic blood pressure was also greater with ramipril than enalapril by 2.4mmHg (90% confidence interval: 0.5‐4.2mmHg). For the difference in the drop of 24‐hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure between ramipril and enalapril the lower level of the 90% confidence interval (CI) is above the clinically relevant difference of ‐3mmHg. This is an indication that ramipril (2.5 and 5mg dose) is at least as effective as enalapril (10 and 20mg dose) in decreasing blood pressure in patients with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension. The duration of adequate antihypertensive effect was relatively long for both ramipril and enalapril; however, ramipril tended to have a more prolonged antihypertensive effect. Ramipril had a higher diastolic and systolic trough/peak ratio than enalapril, resulting in a more uniform antihypertensive effect over the 24‐hour treatment period. Both ramipril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference63 articles.

1. Ambulatory blood pressure: mortality and morbidity;Perloff D;J Hypertension,1991

2. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. II. Clinical use

3. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the progress of antihypertensive therapy;Julius S;J Hypertension,1989

4. The Emerging Role of ACE Inhibitors in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease

5. ACE inhibitors

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3