Affiliation:
1. Department of Risk Management/Insurance, Real Estate and Legal Studies Florida State University Tallahassee Florida USA
Abstract
AbstractA “seat belt defense” allows a defendant in a third‐party auto liability event to present evidence of seat belt nonuse to reduce a plaintiff's recovery. When successfully applied, the defense has a direct effect on reducing liability payouts by insurers for accidents. Our analysis reveals that seat belt defense laws are associated with a 10% reduction in auto claims costs, which equates to a reduction in loss costs of approximately $14 per insured vehicle. We find little evidence that the defense reduces accident frequency and no evidence that the defense affects seat belt usage. The lack of a deterrent effect on driving behavior suggests that the availability of the defense is not salient to drivers. The reduction in loss costs supports the notion that defense lawyers are aware of the defense and make use of it. The resulting effect of lowering insurance payouts may alleviate increasing auto insurance costs.
Reference54 articles.
1. The seat belt defense reconsidered: A return to accountability in tort law;Ackerman R.;New Mexico Law Review,1986
2. Anderson J. M. Heaton P. &Carroll S. J.(2010).The U.S. experience with no‐fault automobile insurance: A retrospective.RAND Institute for Civil Justice.
3. Does the Threat of Insurer Liability for “Bad Faith” Affect Insurance Settlements?
4. Avraham R.(2014).Database of state tort law reforms(5th ed.).
5. The seat belt defense: A doctrine based in common sense;Bomer J.;Tulsa Law Review,2002