Professionals' Perceptions of the Colorectal Cancer Pathway: Results of a Co‐Constructed Qualitative Study

Author:

Delaye Matthieu1ORCID,Polomeni Alice2,Faiderbe Sylvie3,Berlioz Nadège3,Benssekoum Chaïma4,Guillemin Aude1,Pudlarz Thomas5,de Montgolfier Sandrine67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, Versailles Saint‐Quentin University Paris Saclay University Saint‐Cloud France

2. Department of Clinical Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Saint‐Antoine Hospital, AP‐HP Sorbonne University Paris France

3. Université des patients Sorbonne University Paris France

4. IRIS 997 INSERM Aubervilliers France

5. Département de Médecine Gustave Roussy Villejuif France

6. INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM Aix Marseille University Marseille France

7. Université Paris Est Créteil Creteil France

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroductionQualitative research on the perceptions of healthcare professionals involved in cancer care about their respective roles in the patient care pathway is limited. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative study was to document these perceptions.MethodsA multidisciplinary team that included patient researchers constructed a semi‐structured interview guide on the perceptions of the colorectal cancer care pathway by professionals. Interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals from two French hospitals that manage patients with colorectal cancer. Then, the interviews were fully transcribed and analysed by the whole multidisciplinary team.ResultsThirteen healthcare professionals were interviewed (six nurses, four physicians, one psychologist, one social worker and one secretary). They described the colorectal care pathway using a great lexical diversity and listed a significant number of professionals as taking part in this pathway. Among the people mentioned were healthcare professionals working inside and outside the hospital, family members and non‐conventional medicine practitioners. However, they did not spontaneously mention the patient. Their views on the role of the referring physician, the general practitioner and the patient were further explored. The interviews highlighted the coordination difficulties among the various professionals, particularly between general practitioners and hospital teams. These data provided interesting elements for developing a tool to help coordination among professionals.ConclusionsThis preliminary study, with its participatory design, brings interesting elements of reflection on the care pathway for patients with colorectal cancer. It will continue through the creation of a larger participatory project.Patient or Public ContributionPatient partners were included in all steps of this study. This transdisciplinary project was coordinated by a group composed of three patient partners, two healthcare professionals and two humanities and social sciences researchers. Their knowledge of the patient's perspective on the care pathway enriched discussions from the study design to results analysis.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference44 articles.

1. “The Cancer Plans—Strategy to Combat Cancer in France ” INCa accessed June 22 2023 https://www.e-cancer.fr/Institut-national-du-cancer/Strategie-de-lutte-contre-les-cancers-en-France/Les-Plans-cancer.

2. Implementing personalized pathways for cancer follow‐up care in the United States: Proceedings from an American Cancer Society–American Society of Clinical Oncology summit

3. “8th Report From the Societal Cancer Observatory ” Ligue contre le cancer accessed June 22 2023 https://www.ligue-cancer.net/article/54393_8eme-rapport-de-lobservatoire-societal-des-cancers.

4. Recherches;Sifer‐Rivière L.,2018

5. Dispenser des anticancéreux oraux à l’officine. Contraintes professionnelles et pistes d’actions

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3