Facilitating learners' self‐assessment during formative writing tasks using writing analytics toolkit

Author:

Tang Luzhen1,Shen Kejie1,Le Huixiao1,Shen Yuan2,Tan Shufang1,Zhao Yueying1,Juelich Torsten3,Li Xinyu4,Gašević Dragan4,Fan Yizhou14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School of Education Peking University Beijing China

2. Research Center for Data Hub and Security Zhejiang Lab Zhejiang China

3. Department of Foreign Languages University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

4. Faculty of Information Technology, Centre for Learning Analytics Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLearners' writing skills are critical to their academic and professional development. Previous studies have shown that learners' self‐assessment during writing is essential for assessing their writing products and monitoring their writing processes. However, conducting practical self‐assessments of writing remains challenging for learners without help, such as formative feedback.ObjectivesTo facilitate learners' self‐assessment in writing, we developed a writing analytics toolkit and used data visualisation and cutting‐edge machine learning technology that provides real‐time and formative feedback to learners.MethodsTo investigate whether our newly‐developed tool affects the accuracy and process of learners' self‐assessment, we conducted a lab study. We assigned 59 learners to complete writing (2 h) and revising (1 h) tasks. During the revision stage, we randomly assigned the learners to two groups: one group used the writing analytics toolkit while the second group was not granted access to the toolkit. Learners' self‐assessment accuracy and process of self‐assessment were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn our study, we found the toolkit helped learners in the experimental group improve the self‐assessment accuracy of their writing products compared to the learners in the control group. In addition, we also found that the affordances of the toolkit affected the learners' self‐assessment process, and poor design affordances may have prevented the learners from reflecting by themselves.ConclusionsTogether, our empirical study shed light on the design of future writing analytics tools which aim at improving learners' self‐assessment during formative writing processes.

Funder

Peking University

Publisher

Wiley

Reference111 articles.

1. A critical review of research on student self‐assessment;Andrade H. L.;Frontiers in Education,2019

2. Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric‐referenced self‐assessment on elementary school students' writing;Andrade H. L.;Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,2008

3. Speaking self‐assessment: Mismatches between learners' and teachers' criteria;Babaii E.;Language Testing,2016

4. The role of self‐, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners' writing performance;Birjandi P.;Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,2012

5. Developing the theory of formative assessment;Black P.;Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education),2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3