Effect of Material and Pad Abrasion on Shear Bond Strength of 3D‐Printed Orthodontic Brackets

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the effect of printing material and air abrasion of bracket pads on the shear bond strength of 3D‐printed plastic orthodontic brackets when bonded to the enamel of extracted human teeth.Materials and MethodsPremolar brackets were 3D‐printed using the design of a commercially available plastic bracket in two biocompatible resins: Dental LT Resin and Dental SG Resin (n = 40/material). 3D‐printed brackets and commercially manufactured plastic brackets were divided into two groups (n = 20/group), one of which was air abraded. All brackets were bonded to extracted human premolars, and shear bond strength tests were performed. The failure types of each sample were classified using a 5‐category modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) scoring system.ResultsBracket material and bracket pad surface treatment presented statistically significant effects for shear bond strengths, and a significant interaction effect between bracket material and bracket pad surface treatment was observed. The non‐air abraded (NAA) SG group (8.87 ± 0.64 MPa) had a statistically significantly lower shear bond strength than the air abraded (AA) SG group (12.09 ± 1.23 MPa). In the manufactured brackets and LT Resin groups, the NAA and AA groups were not statistically significantly different within each resin. A significant effect of bracket material and bracket pad surface treatment on ARI score was observed, but no significant interaction effect between bracket material and pad treatment was found.Conclusion3D‐printed orthodontic brackets presented clinically sufficient shear bond strengths both with and without AA prior to bonding. The effect of bracket pad AA on shear bond strength depends on the bracket material.