Factors affecting clinical outcomes of continuous and intermittent plasmapheresis in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionAcute hypertriglyceridemia is considered a category III indication for plasmapheresis. The use of plasma as replacement fluid (RF) has been suggested to replace the consumed lipoprotein lipase. Heparin when used as an anticoagulant could possibly release lipoprotein lipase, thereby increasing triglyceride clearance.MethodsThe impact of RF (albumin vs fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and anticoagulant (ACD‐A vs. heparin) on triglycerides following plasmapheresis in 27 patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG) was investigated. A paired study of four patients with recurrent SHTG was conducted, evaluating continuous (Optia) versus intermittent flow plasmapheresis (Haemonetics).ResultsShorter procedures positively impacted triglycerides (TG) drop post‐sessions p < 0.05. In albumin sessions, patients who used heparin demonstrated significantly greater drop in TG and required less sessions than did those with citrate p < 0.05. In heparin sessions, patients who used albumin demonstrated significantly greater drop in triglycerides and required less sessions than did those with FFP p < 0.05. Three of six patients who used FFP and heparin showed a triglyceride drop of 11.7% following three sessions and a 50% drop with one albumin session. Compared with Haemonetics, Optia removed comparable volumes of plasma in less time, processing smaller blood volumes and using less citrate p < 0.05. Patients demonstrated significantly lower drop in TG and required more sessions with Haemonetics than they did with Optia p < 0.05.ConclusionShorter procedure was the main predictor for effective TG clearance. This can be achieved by continuous apheresis technology, particularly when using albumin as RF. TG removal via Optia seems to be optimized by using heparin.