Affiliation:
1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP) Araraquara Brazil
2. School of Dentistry (FAODO) Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) Campo Grande Mato Grosso Brazil
3. University of Southern Santa Catarina Tubarão Santa Catarina Brazil
4. Department of Biological Sciences – Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry Universidade de São Paulo – USP São Paulo Bauru Brazil
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundMedium‐term evaluate the bond strength and tag formation in root dentin using self‐adhesive cements Maxcem Elite (MCE), Relyx U200 (RU2), SeT PP (SPP) and Megalink (MGL) compared to conventional cement Relyx ARC (ARC) for glass fibre post cementation.Materials and methodsOne hundred bovine incisors roots were endodontically treated and divided into 5 groups (n = 20) according to the cementation system: MCE, RU2, SPP, MGL and ARC. All cementation systems were evaluated at 24 h (1) and 12 months (2) after post cementation. Specimens from the cervical, middle and apical thirds of the root were submitted to push‐out bond strength test and confocal laser microscopy to verify the dentin penetration. The adhesive failure mode was classified as adhesive, cohesive and mixed. Data were analysed by one‐way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 5%).ResultsARC‐1 and ARC‐12 showed the highest bond strength (P < 0.05). ARC showed the greatest tag extension, regardless of the third (P < 0.05). The most frequent failure mode in the 24‐h analysis was cohesive, regardless of the cement used. For the 12‐month analysis, mixed failure was the most frequent.ConclusionConventional cement (ARC) showed the highest bond strength and tag extension, regardless of the evaluation period. In all cementation systems, the bond strength decreased after 12 months. © 2023 Australian Dental Association.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior