Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmaceutical and Nutrition Care Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Omaha Nebraska USA
2. University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Omaha Nebraska USA
3. Eurofins Viracor Lenexa Kansas USA
4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundValganciclovir prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) is recommended for solid organ transplant recipients, but is associated with drawbacks, including expense and leukopenia. Our center adopted a strategy of serial assessment with a CMV‐specific T cell immunity panel (CMV‐TCIP) and cessation of valganciclovir prophylaxis upon demonstration of adequate CD4+ responses in kidney transplant patients at high risk of CMV disease.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed adult recipients of a kidney or pancreas transplant between August 2019 and July 2021 undergoing serial CMV‐TCIP monitoring. Included patients were considered high risk for CMV, defined by donor positive (D+)/recipient negative (R−) CMV IgG serostatus, or recipient positive (R+) patients who received induction with a lymphocyte‐depleting agent. Prophylaxis was discontinued after a patient's first CMV‐specific CD4+ T cell value of ≥0.20%. Risk of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) in those who underwent early discontinuation of CMV prophylaxis and predictors of CMV T cell immunity were analyzed.ResultsOf 54 included patients, 22 stopped prophylaxis early due to CMV‐specific CD4+ T cell immunity at a median of 4.7 (IQR: 3.8–5.4) months after transplant. No instances of csCMVi were observed in the 22 patients who had prophylaxis discontinued early, of whom 19/22 were CMV R+ and 3/22 were CMV D+/R−. Donor/recipient CMV serostatus was predictive of immunity (p <.001).ConclusionEarly discontinuation of valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients with CMV CD4+ T cellular immunity appears safe and potentially beneficial in this preliminary series, especially in R+ patients. Further study is warranted, given that truncated prophylaxis may yield patient‐level benefits.
image