Comparison of short‐term outcomes of robotic‐assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score‐matched analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of short‐term outcomes of robotic‐assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Published:2022-05-12 Issue:4 Volume:15 Page:753-764
ISSN:1758-5902
Container-title:Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Asian J Endoscop Surgery

Author:

Yamanashi Takahiro¹^ORCID,Miura Hirohisa¹,Tanaka Toshimichi¹,Watanabe Akiko¹^ORCID,Goto Takuya¹,Yokoi Keigo¹,Kojo Ken¹,Niihara Masahiro²,Hosoda Kei²^ORCID,Kaizu Takashi³^ORCID,Yamashita Keishi⁴,Sato Takeo⁵,Kumamoto Yusuke³,Hiki Naoki²^ORCID,Naitoh Takeshi¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan

2. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan

3. Department of General, Pediatric and Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan

4. Division of Advanced Surgical Oncology, Department of Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan

5. Research and Development Center for Medical Education, Department Clinical Skills Education Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ases.13075

Reference38 articles.

1. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial

2. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial

3. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

4. A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer

5. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Robotic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of circumferential resection margin positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis;European Journal of Surgical Oncology;2024-10

2. Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery;2024-09-03

3. Robotic-assisted Pediatric Thoracic and Abdominal Tumor Resection: An Initial Multi-center Review;Journal of Pediatric Surgery;2024-08

4. Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients;World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;2024-05-27

5. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for visceral obesity in mid–low rectal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis;Journal of Robotic Surgery;2024-04-20