Public perceptions of dietetics services in Australia and New Zealand

Author:

Forsyth Adrienne1ORCID,Beck Eleanor2ORCID,Kruger Rozanne34ORCID,Pelly Fiona5ORCID,Wall Clare6ORCID,Boak Rachel7ORCID,Allman‐Farinelli Margaret8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Catholic University Fitzroy Australia

2. University of New South Wales Kensington Australia

3. Griffith University Nathan Australia

4. Massey University Palmerston North New Zealand

5. University of the Sunshine Coast Sippy Downs Australia

6. University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

7. Council of Deans of Nutrition and Dietetics Australia and New Zealand Brisbane Australia

8. University of Sydney Camperdown Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this study was to examine expectations, perceptions and attitudes about dietetics services among the Australian and New Zealand public, to provide insights for building a future dietetics workforce that will meet consumer needs.MethodsA cross‐sectional, anonymous, online survey was employed to gain perspectives of a representative sample of Australian and New Zealand adults. Questions were purposely designed to collect views regarding sources of dietary information, expectations of dietetics service providers and factors influencing choice of dietetics service provider. Data were analysed descriptively and using Pearson's chi‐square test to assess relationships between categorical variables. Free‐text responses were analysed using content analysis.ResultsOf 2601 respondents, approximately one third (32%) had seen a dietitian. Doctors were the most trusted sources of dietary information (87%), particularly with participants over 60 years (χ(1) = 44.168, V = 0.130, p < 0.001). Cost was the most frequently reported factor influencing choice of dietetics services (56%), with 88% of respondents interested in accessing a dietitian, preferably in‐person (64%), if they could do so for no cost. Participants anticipated that dietitians would offer services like meal plans (59%) and nutritional analysis (48%) as well as weight and other body measurements (56%). Some expectations such as blood tests (54%) were outside the usual scope of dietetic practice.ConclusionThe results of this study have implications for practising dietitians, dietetics educators, and funders of dietetics services. Cost as a barrier suggests that advocacy to government for funding type, duration and number of visits to dietitians is still required.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference46 articles.

1. New Zealand Institute of Economic Research.A critical missing ingredient. The case for increased dietetic input in tier 1 health services. NZIER Report to Dietitians New Zealand.2021.

2. Investing in big ideas: utilisation and cost of Medicare Allied Health services in Australia under the Chronic Disease Management initiative in primary care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3