Abstract
AbstractThat robots might become persons is increasingly explored in popular fiction and films and is receiving growing academic analysis. Here, I ask what would be necessary for robots not to become persons at some point. After examining the meanings of “robots” and “persons,” I discuss whether robots might not become persons from a range of perspectives: evolution (which has led over time from species that do not exhibit personhood to species that do), development (personhood is something into which each of us grows), chemistry (must persons be carbon‐based and must robots be non–carbon‐based?), history (we now consider more entities to be persons than was once the case), and theology (are humans privileged over the rest of creation, and how relevant is panpsychism?). I end by considering some of the implications if/once robots do become persons.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Religious studies,Education,Cultural Studies
Reference40 articles.
1. All The Tropes.2021. “Silicon‐Based Life.”https://allthetropes.fandom.com/wiki/Silicon‐Based_Life#
2. Asimov Isaac.1962. “Not as We Know It: The Chemistry of Life.”http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/HTML/CS09/cs09p05.htm
3. Theological Dimensions of Humanlike Robots: A Roadmap for Theological Inquiry
4. Mind and Emergence