Comparison of gracilis and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap neovaginal reconstruction performed during radical pelvic surgery: flap-specific morbidity

Abstract

To compare flap-specific complications of gracilis myocutaneous (GM) and rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap neovaginal reconstructions after radical pelvic surgery. The study was a single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing concurrent radical pelvic surgery with GM or RAM neovaginal reconstructions performed on a gynecological oncology service, 1978–2003. Flap-specific complications were compared between the techniques. Forty-four GM and 32 RAM neovaginal reconstructions were analyzed: plastic surgeons developed 12 (27%) GM and 4 (13%) RAM flaps, with all other flaps performed by gynecological oncologists. Primary procedures included 54 (71%) total pelvic exenterations, with partial exenterations or radical vulvovaginectomies in 16 (21%) and 6 (8%) patients, respectively. Forty (53%) patients had received radiation and 28 (36%) received chemoradiation before radical surgery. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, other than more frequent use of continent urinary conduits (P < 0.001) and a trend for more frequent sidewall radiation (P < 0.1) in the RAM group, reflecting use in more recent patients (P < 0.001). Median follow-up is 28 months (range: 2 weeks to 216 months), with 5% acute operative mortality. Flap-specific complications were significantly increased in GM patients (P < 0.03). Overall flap loss was significantly increased in GM patients (P < 0.02). Thirty (59%) of 51 patients surviving for more than 12 months reported coitus, with no significant difference between the groups. Because of lower overall incidence of flap-specific complications and significantly lower incidence of flap loss compared with GM flap, RAM flap has become our technique of choice for neovaginal reconstruction concurrent with radical pelvic surgery.