Affiliation:
1. University of Pretoria Pretoria South Africa
2. Victoria University Melbourne Australia
3. Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain
Abstract
AbstractDuring a lively debate between Haroon Bhorat and Michael Sachs at the University of Pretoria recently, Bhorat pleaded for supply‐side measures to alleviate poverty in South Africa, rather than demand‐side measures. (The debate took place during a session at the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences' Inaugural Research Day on 8 September, 2023).Bhorat claimed that the SRD grants could not secure a solution to unemployment in a sustainable manner. In this paper, we use the UPGEM Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model of the University of Pretoria to test the performance of wage subsidies in South Africa, in comparison to the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grants of the same expenditure magnitude, and report on the differences between the two policy measures in terms of (i) unemployment alleviation, (ii) poverty alleviation and (iii) economic impact in general.
Reference22 articles.
1. Bhorat H. Hill R. Khan S. Lilenstein K. &Stanwix B.(2020)The employment tax incentive scheme in South Africa: an impact assessment. Working Papers 202007 University of Cape Town Development Policy Research Unit. Available at:https://commerce.uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/content_migration/commerce_uct_ac_za/1093/files/DPRU%2520WP202007.pdf
2. Burns J. Edwards L.&Pauw K.(2010)Wage subsidies to combat unemployment and poverty: assessing South Africa's options.
3. Revisiting wage subsidies: How pro-poor is a South African wage subsidy likely to be?
4. Ebrahim A.(2021)A policy for the jobless youth: the employment tax incentive chapter 5 (112–146). University of Cape Town. PhD Thesis.http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33733
5. Ebrahim A.&Pirttilä J.(2022).A policy for the jobless youth in South Africa: individual impacts of the employment tax incentive. WIDER Working Paper 2022/124. Helsinki: UNU‐WIDER.https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2022/257-7