A Systematic Investigation of the Effects of Standard‐Sample Concentration Mismatch during Fe Isotope Measurement by MC‐ICP‐MS

Author:

King‐Doonan Elizabeth K.12ORCID,Bilenker Laura D.13ORCID,Weis Dominque1ORCID,Gordon Kathy1,Fourny Anaïs1,Patton Genna M.1,Zhao Ye4

Affiliation:

1. Multi‐Disciplinary Applied Geochemistry Network, Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada

2. DEVCOM ARL, Army Research Office Durham NC 27709 USA

3. Department of Geosciences, College of Sciences and Mathematics Auburn University Auburn AL 36849 USA

4. Nu Instruments Ltd 74 Clywedog Road South Wrexham LL13 9XS UK

Abstract

Advances in multi‐collector inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (MC‐ICP‐MS) have led to the widespread use of iron (Fe) isotopes to elucidate the (bio)geochemical history of a range of environments. To generate Fe isotope ratio measurements, standard‐sample bracketing (SSB) is commonly used to correct for instrumental mass bias inherent to MC‐ICP‐MS. However, SSB is only accurate when sample and isotope standard Fe concentrations match, in addition to the bulk solution matrix. When the Fe concentrations differ, Fe isotope ratio measurement results may be inaccurate, a phenomenon known as the "self‐induced matrix effect." This study systematically characterised the self‐induced matrix effect for dry plasma Fe isotope ratio measurements on three MC‐ICP‐MS instruments and three introduction systems. Our extensive dataset indicates that: (1) the degree of mass bias is consistent regardless of MC‐ICP‐MS front‐end design, (2) the degree of mass bias becomes less reproducible as the concentration difference between the sample and bracketing standard increases, and (3) this applies to both pure Fe solutions and solutions from geological materials. This study reinforces the requirement to match bracketing standard and sample concentrations within 10% and provides a correction method for that fall beyond the recommended concentration range to subsequently allow for proper concentration matching during SSB.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3