Training framework for high‐stakes OSCE: Experience from volunteer standardized patients' bank

Author:

Feigerlova Eva123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre Universitaire d'Enseignement par la Simulation (CUESim) ‐ Hôpital Virtuel de Lorraine, Faculté de Médecine, Maïeutique et métiers de la Santé Université de Lorraine Nancy France

2. CHRU‐Nancy, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition Université de Lorraine Nancy France

3. INSERM UMR_S 1116 ‐ DCAC Université de Lorraine Nancy France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTraining of standardized patients (SPs) for national high‐stakes OSCE helps to ensure a reliable assessment of student performance in various clinical scenarios. However, workflow protocols to train SPs vary. Medical schools adopt specific measures to ensure standardization.ApproachWe present a development workflow of the SPs' training framework for high‐stakes OSCE using a volunteer SPs' bank. Our approach was guided by the social learning theory. Three educators and 17/20 (85%) members of our volunteer SPs' bank worked in a collaborative partnership on the construction of pedagogical content of the training framework comprising three 2‐hour sessions. Since SPs have to demonstrate acquired behaviors, intended learning outcomes used the words “apply”, “perform” and “participate.”EvaluationA principal part of the evaluation was the achievement of intended learning outcomes by the SPs during 3 formative OSCEs. Seventeen SPs, 356 fourth year medical students and 60 examiners participated. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected by post‐session questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Twelve examiners evaluated a mean of 29.7+/−0.14 SD patient‐student encounters. In total, 15/16 SPs (93.8%) considered the contact with students as easy and 4 SPs (31%) reported the experience as stressful. Two themes emerged from the free‐text comments: “Gaining experience as SP” and “Concerns for evaluated students.”ImplicationThe proposed SPs' training framework for high‐stakes OSCE may be useful for other medical disciplines and health professions initiating SP‐based assessment programs. The strategy of development and evaluation are outlined to guide a successful application of the curriculum standards.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference15 articles.

1. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC

2. Arrêté du 21 décembre 2021 relatif à l'organisation des épreuves nationales donnant accès au troisième cycle des études de médecine.https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/eli/arrete/2021/12/21/ESRS2138083A/jo/texte. Accessed 31 July 2023.

3. Quality Assurance Best Practices for Simulation-Based Examinations

4. The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP)

5. Key challenges in simulated patient programs: An international comparative case study

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3