Experimental assessment of obsidian versus chert lanceolate projectile point durability and robusticity: Semi‐static fracture strength and dynamic impact-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Experimental assessment of obsidian versus chert lanceolate projectile point durability and robusticity: Semi‐static fracture strength and dynamic impact

Published:2022-05-17 Issue:6 Volume:64 Page:1307-1324
ISSN:0003-813X
Container-title:Archaeometry
language:en
Short-container-title:Archaeometry

Author:

Gala Nicholas¹,Mika Anna¹,Wilson Michael²,Williams Jeremy³,Buchanan Briggs⁴,Walker Robert S.⁵,Bebber Michelle R.¹,Eren Metin I.¹⁶^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anthropology Kent State University Kent OH USA

2. ASC Group, Inc. Columbus OH USA

3. Department of Geology Kent State University Kent OH USA

4. Department of Anthropology University of Tulsa Tulsa OK USA

5. Department of Anthropology University of Missouri Columbia MO USA

6. Department of Archaeology Cleveland Museum of Natural History Cleveland OH USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Archeology,History

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/arcm.12787

Reference76 articles.

1. Do projectile points get cold? An experimental approach examining composite and stone projectile technology

2. Raw-Material Availability and the Organization of Technology

3. Developing a stable point: Evaluating the temporal and geographic consistency of Late Prehistoric unnotched triangular point functional design in Midwestern North America

4. The non-invention of the ceramic arrowhead in world archaeology

5. Toolstone selection and lithic technology in early Great Basin prehistory;Beck C.;Journal of Field Archaeology,1990

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Chipped-Stone Crescents from the Terminal Pleistocene–Early Holocene of Far Western North America and the Transverse Projectile Point Hypothesis;Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory;2024-08-31

2. Clovis points and foreshafts under braced weapon compression: Modeling Pleistocene megafauna encounters with a lithic pike;PLOS ONE;2024-08-21

3. Controlled comparative tensile tests of backed versus non‐backed edges’ adhesion: Inferences into stone tool functional properties;Archaeometry;2024-08-15

4. Clovis bone versus stone weapon tip penetration: Thinking about relative costs and benefits, experimental assumptions, and archaeological unknowns at Sheriden Cave, Ohio, U.S.A;Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports;2023-12

5. Toolstone characterization, description, morphometrics, and microwear of a lithic sample from Uptar, Magadan Oblast, Northeastern Siberia, Russia;Archaeological Research in Asia;2023-09