Amantadine in unvaccinated patients with early, mild to moderate COVID‐19: A randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial

Author:

Rejdak Konrad1ORCID,Fiedor Piotr2,Bonek Robert3,Łukasiak Jacek4,Chełstowski Waldemar4,Kiciak Sławomir5,Dąbrowski Piotr5,Gala‐Błądzińska Agnieszka6,Dec Mateusz7,Papuć Ewa1,Zasybska Adriana1,Kaczor Marcin8,Grieb Paweł9,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland

2. Department of General and Transplantation Surgery Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

3. Department of Neurology and Clinical Neuroimmunology Regional Specialist Hospital Grudziadz Poland

4. Regional Hospital SPZZOZ in Wyszkόw Wyszkόw Poland

5. Independent Voivodeship Hospital “Jana Bożego” in Lublin Lublin Poland

6. Collegium Medicum University of Rzeszów and St. Queen Jadwiga Clinical District Hospital No. 2 Rzeszów Poland

7. SPZOZ Kalwaria Zebrzydowska Kalwaria Zebrzydowska Poland

8. Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków Poland

9. Department of Experimental Pharmacology Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeAdamantanes were listed as an interesting option as an early intervention against COVID‐19. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of amantadine in preventing the progression of COVID‐19 and its neurological sequelae.MethodsUnvaccinated patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection within 5 days were enrolled. Subjects were randomized (50:50) to amantadine (AMD; 100 mg twice daily) or placebo (PLB) for 14 days. The Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement of the World Health Organization (OSCI‐WHO) was the primary measure. Secondary endpoints included assessment for fatigue; depression, disorders of smell and taste, and sleepiness on Days 1 and 15.ResultsWe enrolled 99 patients (49 AMD and 50 PLB). Disease progression (OSCI‐WHO = 4) was observed in 6% (AMD) and 8% (PLB) patients (p > 0.05) with further deterioration (OSCI‐WHO〉4) in 0% (AMD) and 8% (PLB) patients (p > 0.05). Complete recovery on Day 15 was 60% higher in the AMD compared with the PLB group (p = 0.025). There was improvement in taste (AMD: p = 0.003; PLB: p = 0.0001) and smell (AMD: p = 0.005; PLB: p = 0.0004) but not in fatigue in both groups. Improvement was observed in the AMD (p = 0.010) but not in the PLB group (p = 0.058) when assessing depression as well as sleepiness (AMD: p = 0.0002; PLB: p = 0.341). There was one death in the PLB group (2.0%) and none in the AMD group (p > 0.05) until Day 210. Overall, the drug was well tolerated.ConclusionThe central effects of amantadine on the nervous system with reduction of sleepiness and depression might have had a supportive effect on faster recovery in early COVID‐19 patients.

Funder

Agencja Badań Medycznych

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3