A Contentious Triangle: Grading and Academic Freedom in the Academy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Contentious Triangle: Grading and Academic Freedom in the Academy

Published:2011-01 Issue:1 Volume:65 Page:3-11
ISSN:0951-5224
Container-title:Higher Education Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hill Duncan

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00465.x/fullpdf

Reference20 articles.

1. American Association of University Professors (AAUP) 1967 Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/policydocs/contents/stud-rights.htm

2. Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) 2005 Policy Statement on Academic Freedom http://www.caut.ca/pages.asp?page=247&lang=1

3. Education Reform Act 1988 http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880040_en_1

4. Euben , D. 2001 Who Grades Students? Some Legal Cases, Some Best Practices http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/protect/legal/topics/whogrades.htm

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Conclusion;Global Perspectives on Enhancing Doctoral Co-Supervision;2024

2. Academic Freedom as a Defensive Right;Hague Journal on the Rule of Law;2023-01-09

3. Academic achievement standards and quality assurance;Quality in Higher Education;2017-05-04

4. Innovation failure in the eye of the beholder: towards a theory of innovation shaped by competing agendas within higher education;Public Management Review;2017-03-17

5. Key Concepts: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations;Learning Standards and the Assessment of Quality in Higher Education: Contested Policy Trajectories;2016