Clinician challenges to evidence‐based prescribing for heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A qualitative evaluation

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundReasons for suboptimal prescribing for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been identified, but it is unclear if they remain relevant with recent advances in healthcare delivery and technologies. This study aimed to identify and understand current clinician‐perceived challenges to prescribing guideline‐directed HFrEF medications.MethodsWe conducted content analysis methodology, including interviews and member‐checking focus groups with primary care and cardiology clinicians. Interview guides were informed by the Cabana Framework.ResultsWe conducted interviews with 33 clinicians (13 cardiology specialists, 22 physicians) and member checking with 10 of these. We identified four levels of challenges from the clinician perspective. Clinician level challenges included misconceptions about guideline recommendations, clinician assumptions (e.g., drug cost or affordability), and clinical inertia. Patient–clinician level challenges included misalignment of priorities and insufficient communication. Clinician–clinician level challenges were primarily between generalists and specialists, including lack of role clarity, competing priorities of providing focused versus holistic care, and contrasting confidence regarding safety of newer drugs. Policy and system/organisation level challenges included insufficient access to timely/reliable patient data, and unintended care gaps for medications without financially incentivized metrics.ConclusionThis study presents current challenges faced by cardiology and primary care which can be used to strategically design interventions to improve guideline‐directed care for HFrEF. The findings support the persistence of many challenges and also sheds light on new challenges. New challenges identified include conflicting perspectives between generalists and specialists, hesitancy to prescribe newer medications due to safety concerns, and unintended consequences related to value‐based reimbursement metrics for select medications.