Should Welfare Administration be Centralized or Decentralized? Evidence from a Policy Experiment

Author:

Boockmann Bernhard1,Walter Thomas2,Huber Martin3,Thomsen Stephan L.4,Göbel Christian5

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Applied Economic Research (IAW), Tübingen , Germany

2. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim , Germany

3. University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen , Switzerland

4. Lower Saxony Institute for Economic Research (NIW), Hannover , Germany

5. University of Applied Labour Studies of the Federal Employment Agency, Mannheim , Germany

Abstract

Abstract The 2005 reform of the German welfare system introduced two competing organizational models for welfare administration. In most districts, a centralized organization was established where local welfare agencies are bound to central directives. At the same time, 69 districts were allowed to opt for a decentralized organization. We evaluate the relative success of both types in terms of integrating welfare recipients into employment. Compared to centralized organization, decentralized organization has a negative effect on employment chances of males. For women, no significant effect is found. These findings are robust to the inclusion of aspects of internal organization common to both types of agencies.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference47 articles.

1. Aldashev , A. S. L. Thomsen T. Walter 2010 Short-term Training Programs for Immigrants: Do Effects Differ from Natives and Why?

2. Arntz , M. R. Wilke H. Winterhager 2006 Regionenmatching im Rahmen der Evaluation der Experimentierklausel des § 6c SGB II: Methodische Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse

3. Active Labor Market Policy Effects for Women in Europe: A Survey;Bergemann;Annales d'Economie et de Statistique,2008

4. Bernhard , S. H. Gartner G. Stephan 2008 Wage Subsidies for Needy Job-Seekers and Their Effect on Individual Labor Market Outcomes after the German Reforms

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3