Tele‐visits for GERD: “Ecofriendly, efficient and effective”

Author:

Roy Winnie1ORCID,Hans Bandhul2ORCID,Jannat Rida Ul3,Reddy Yala Kirthi4ORCID,Hadi Yousaf4,Gayam Swapna4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Internal Medicine Residency WVU Medicine Camden Clark Medical Center Parkersburg WV USA

2. Internal Medicine Residency Allegheny General Hospital Pittsburgh PA USA

3. Department of Medicine West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA

4. Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and AimSars‐CoV‐19 pandemic necessitated a transition to telemedicine for many healthcare encounters. The environmental impact of this transition in gastroenterology (GI) combined with user experience has not been studied.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent telemedicine visits (telephone and video) at a GI clinic at West Virginia University.Distance of patients' residence from clinic × 2 was calculated, and Environmental Protection Agency calculators utilized to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that were avoided from tele‐visits.Patients were reached by telephone and were asked questions to fill in a validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with Likert scales (1–7). Variables were also collected via chart review.ResultsA total of 81 video and 89 telephone visits were conducted for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) between March 2020 and March 2021. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, with a response rate of 65.29%. Mean age was lower in the video visit cohort compared with the telephone visit cohort (43.45 ± 14.32 years vs 52.34 ± 17.46 years). Most patients had medications prescribed during the visit (79.3%), and a majority had laboratory testing orders placed (57.7%).We calculated a total distance of 8732 miles that the patients would have traveled if they were to present for in‐person visits (including return trips). A total of 393.3 gallons of gasoline would have been required to transport these patients to and from the healthcare facility to their residence. A total of 3.5 metric tons of GHG's were saved by avoiding 393.3 gallons of gasoline for travel. In relatable terms, this is equivalent to burning more than 3500 pounds of coal. This averages to 31.5‐kg GHG emissions and 3.54 gallons of gasoline saved per patient.ConclusionTelemedicine for GERD resulted in significant environmental savings and was rated highly for access, satisfaction, and usability by patients. Telemedicine for GERD can be an excellent alternative to in‐person visits.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Hepatology

Reference21 articles.

1. Healthcare's climate footprint.https://www.arup.com/perspectives/publications/research/section/healthcares‐climate‐footprint. Accessed June 27 2022.

2. The environmental impacts of telemedicine in place of face-to-face patient care: a systematic review

3. Role of endoscopy in GERD;Sharma VKJGC;Gastroenterology,2014

4. Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3