Effects of implant placement timing and type of soft‐tissue grafting on histological and histomorphometric outcomes in a preclinical canine model

Abstract

AbstractAimTo determine the effects of implant timing and type of soft‐tissue grafting on histological and histomorphometric outcomes in a preclinical model.Materials and MethodsFour implant placement protocols were randomly applied at the mesial root sites of the third and fourth mandibular premolars in 10 mongrel dogs: immediate placement (group IP), early placement (group EP), delayed placement with/without alveolar ridge preservation (groups ARP and DP, respectively). A connective‐tissue graft (CTG) or porcine‐derived volume‐stable collagen matrix (VCMX) was applied to enhance the ridge profile (simultaneously with implant placement in group IP and staged for others), resulting in five sites for each combination. All dogs were sacrificed 3 months after soft‐tissue grafting. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed, and the data were analysed descriptively.ResultsCTG and VCMX were difficult to differentiate from the augmented area. The median total tissue thickness on the buccal aspect of the implant was largest in group IP/CTG (between 2.78 and 3.87 mm). The soft‐tissue thickness was generally favourable with CTG at all implant placement timings. Within the DP groups, CTG yielded statistically significantly larger total and soft‐tissue thickness than VCMX (p < .05). Among the groups with VCMX, group EP/VCMX showed the largest soft‐tissue thickness at apical levels to the implant shoulder.ConclusionsCTG generally led to greater tissue thickness than VCMX.