The (dis)organization of leg ulcer care: A realist synthesis

Author:

Pagnamenta Fania1ORCID,Lhussier Monique2ORCID,Rapley Tim2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

2. Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundVenous leg ulcers affect 1.5% of the UK adult population. Leg ulcers are painful, can be malodourous and are associated with poor quality of life. Leg ulcers are predominantly cared for by nurses in the community. Frequently, patients receive suboptimal treatment through unwanted variations in care and simple ulcers deteriorate to become hard‐to‐heal wounds. It is important to understand the current UK system of care and how nurses and patients navigate through it.AimThe aim of this paper was to understand how, when, for whom and in what context leg ulcers are cared for in the United Kingdom and specifically, the current system of care, the nurses' role and the patients' experience in this system of care.DesignA realist synthesis of the literature was undertaken, reported following the RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses.Data SourcesAn iterative literature search was conducted across three recognized health collections from January 2010 to January 2022 that included descriptive studies as well as primary research.Results73 papers were included.ConclusionIn the absence of UK national guidance that recommends how leg ulcer care is organized and delivered, care is commissioned locally, with variable outcomes. Patients with venous leg ulcers would like to be looked after by knowledgeable, skilled and confident nurses, in well‐equipped and staffed clinics; nurses who have the ability to make clinical judgements to alter their treatment when necessary and are empowered to refer to specialist centres when further support is required.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThis synthesis offers guidance to commissioners and providers to change how leg ulcer care is organized.Patient or Public ContributionThe views of a patient and public group was sought at each stage of the synthesis.

Funder

Burdett Trust for Nursing

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3