The benefits and costs of U.S. employer COVID‐19 vaccine mandates

Author:

Ferranna Maddalena1,Robinson Lisa A.2ORCID,Cadarette Daniel3,Eber Michael R.24,Bloom David E.2

Affiliation:

1. Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

2. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Independent Researcher Cambridge Massachusetts USA

4. Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractIn 2021, the Biden Administration issued mandates requiring COVID‐19 vaccinations for U.S. federal employees and contractors and for some healthcare and private sector workers. These mandates have been challenged in court; some have been halted or delayed. However, their costs and benefits have not been rigorously appraised. This study helps fill that gap. We estimate the direct costs and health‐related benefits that would have accrued if these vaccination requirements had been implemented as intended. Compared with the January 2022 vaccination rates, we find that the mandates could have led to 15 million additional vaccinated individuals, increasing the overall proportion of the fully vaccinated U.S. population from 64% to 68%. The associated net benefits depend on the subsequent evolution of the pandemic—information unavailable ex ante to analysts or policymakers. In scenarios involving the emergence of a novel, more transmissible variant, against which vaccination and previous infection offer moderate protection, the estimated net benefits are potentially large. They reach almost $20,000 per additional vaccinated individual, with more than 20,000 total deaths averted over the 6‐month period assessed. In scenarios involving a fading pandemic, existing vaccination‐acquired or infection‐acquired immunity provides sufficient protection, and the mandates’ benefits are unlikely to exceed their costs. Thus, mandates may be most useful when the consequences of inaction are catastrophic. However, we do not compare the effects of mandates with alternative policies for increasing vaccination rates or for promoting other protective measures, which may receive stronger public support and be less likely to be overturned by litigation.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference61 articles.

1. Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant

2. Duration of Protection against Mild and Severe Disease by Covid-19 Vaccines

3. Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Booster Vaccinations

4. Baxter J. R. Robinson L. A. &Hammitt J. K.(2017).Valuing time in U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulatory impact analyses: Conceptual framework and best practices.https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/valuing‐time‐us‐department‐health‐human‐services‐regulatory‐impact‐analyses‐conceptual‐framework

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3