The effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship program in an Australian rural hospital

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the type, indication and duration of restricted antibiotics prescribed to inpatients who had undergone antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) review by the infectious diseases specialist and to assess the effectiveness of the AMS program in a rural hospital.DesignThis was an observational retrospective study.SettingThe study was conducted at a rural referral hospital in NSW.ParticipantsInpatients from the medical, surgical and intensive care units were included.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measure was the type, indication and average duration of restricted antibiotics that were reviewed in the AMS rounds. The rate of adherence to AMS advice and the rate of step‐down of antibiotics after AMS advice were other outcome measures. Data on participant characteristics were also collected.ResultsThe most commonly prescribed restricted antibiotic in medicine and surgery was amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (28%), followed by ceftriaxone (15%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (10%), with the most common indication being intra‐abdominal infection (37%). In intensive care, ceftriaxone (16.7%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (16.7%) were most prescribed, and the most common indication was community‐acquired pneumonia (24.5%). The adherence rate to AMS advice was 86% in medicine and surgery and 83% in intensive care. AMS rounds managed to cease or step down antibiotics 60% of the time.ConclusionThe AMS program in a rural hospital was effective with an overall AMS advice adherence rate of 84.5% which measures well against tertiary‐level centres. Continued AMS and advocacy of such programs in rural regions are fundamental to optimising patient outcomes in the rural community.