Instruments measuring practitioner performance of the complete examination and screening of neonates: A systematic review

Author:

Greene Liz M12ORCID,Hegarty Josephine1ORCID,O'Connell Rhona1ORCID,Connaughton Breda2,Coveney Kate2,Hardie Philip2,Horton Sally2,Szafranska Marcelina2,Murphy Margaret1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery University College Cork Cork Republic of Ireland

2. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Republic of Ireland

Abstract

AimThe complete examination and screening of the neonate is a recommended assessment of neonatal well‐being conducted by appropriately trained medical, midwifery and nursing personnel at specific intervals during the first 6‐week post‐birth. Our aim was to identify and critically evaluate instruments that measure practitioner performance of this important assessment of neonatal health.MethodsUsing the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology, a systematic review was undertaken.ResultsFour studies were identified as suitable for data extraction and analysis. This paper briefly describes the four instruments, discusses and compares the COSMIN analysis and ratings of each instrument. A recommendation for the instrument identified as the most suitable to measure practitioner performance is provided.ConclusionMost instruments were designed by educators to measure the performance of practitioners developing competence in the complete examination and screening of the neonate. Further development and piloting of instruments designed to measure the performance and continuing competence of qualified practitioners of the newborn examination are required.

Funder

University College Dublin

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference39 articles.

1. Public Health England – PHE.Neonate and infant physical examination screening programme handbook. Public Health England; 2021. Available from:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/newborn‐and‐infant‐physical‐examination‐programme‐handbook/newborn‐and‐infant‐physical‐examination‐screening‐programme‐handbook

2. HSE.The Newborn Clinical Examination Handbook. Health Service Executive; 2018. Available from:https://www.hse.ie/eng/about/who/healthwellbeing/our‐priority‐programmes/child‐health‐and‐wellbeing/neonate%20exam.pdf

3. Paediatrics & Child Health Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians – RACP.Examination of the Newborn. Available from:https://media.starship.org.nz/racp‐examination‐of‐the‐newborn/examinationofthenewborn.pdf

4. A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3