Assessment of the American Academy of Dermatology diagnostic criteria for pediatric atopic dermatitis and modification into a checkbox form: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Udkoff Jeremy12ORCID,Borok Jenna3ORCID,Vaida Florin4,Tang Bin5,Matiz Catalina6,Ahluwalia Jusleen7,Russell Emma8ORCID,Eichenfield Lawrence910

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Division of Dermatology and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel

3. Division of Dermatology Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA

4. Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

5. Department of Psychiatry University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

6. Southern California Permanente Medical Group San Diego California USA

7. Insight Dermatology San Diego California USA

8. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

9. Division of Pediatric and Adolescent Dermatology Rady Children's Hospital San Diego California USA

10. Department of Dermatology and Pediatrics University of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesDiagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited in their performance and/or usability. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) consensus criteria include hierarchical categories of disease features to improve these metrics but have not been validated. Our objective was to create and validate a checkbox form of the AAD consensus criteria in the pediatric population.MethodsWe performed a cross‐sectional study of 100 pediatric patients with AD (n = 58) and diseases in the differential diagnosis of AD (n = 42).ResultsHaving three or more “Essential,” ≥2 “Important,” ≥1 “Associated” features of the AAD criteria was optimal for the diagnosis of AD in children. This combination was 91.4% (95% CI, 84.2%–98.6%) sensitive and 95.2% (88.8%–100%) specific. The UK working party criteria and the Hanifin–Rajka criteria had sensitivities of 96.6% (95% CI 91.9%–100%) and 98.3% (95% CI 94.9%–100%) and specificities of 83.3% (95% CI 72.1%–94.6%) and 71.4% (95% CI 57.8%–85.1%), respectively. The AAD criteria had significantly greater specificity than the Hanifin–Rajka criteria (p = .002).ConclusionsThis study represents an important step in validating the AAD consensus criteria and formulating a useable checkbox form for diagnosing AD in the pediatric population.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Dermatology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference18 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3