Affiliation:
1. Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany
2. Department of Philosophy Cornell University Ithaca NY USA
3. Institute for Ethics and History of Health in Society IEHHS, Faculty of Medicine University of Augsburg/Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Augsburg Germany
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn European countries (excluding the UK and Ireland), official statistics do not use racial or ethnic categories, but instead rely on proxies to collect data about discrimination. In the German microcensus, the proxy category adopted is ‘migration background’ (Migrationshintergrund): an individual has a ‘migration background’ when one or more of their parents does not have German citizenship by birth. We apply a coupled ethical‐epistemic analysis to the ‘migration background’ category to illuminate how the epistemic issues contribute to ethical ones. Our central claim is that these ethical‐epistemic issues with the ‘migration background’ category are best analysed in terms of Charles Mills's ‘white ignorance’. Appealing to Annette Martín's structural account of white ignorance, we highlight the cyclical reinforcement of ignorance and racial injustice in the use of the ‘migration background’ variable. Colourblind eliminativism about race perpetuates the use of ‘migration background’, which sustains and intensifies racial injustices.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reference69 articles.
1. Wer nicht gezählt wird, zählt nicht. Empirische Forschung zu Schwarzen Menschen in Deutschland;Aikins J. K.;WZB Mitteilungen Heft,2020
2. A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being
3. Mills’s account of white ignorance: Structural or non-structural?
4. Recht und Rassismus