‘Is Insulin Right for Me?’: Web‐based intervention to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with non‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes—A randomised controlled trial

Author:

Holmes‐Truscott Elizabeth12ORCID,Holloway Edith E.12,Lam Benjamin123,Baptista Shaira12,Furler John4,Hagger Virginia56ORCID,Skinner Timothy278,Speight Jane12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

2. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Education Futures University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

4. Department of General Practice The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Deakin University Burwood Victoria Australia

6. Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

7. La Trobe Rural Health School La Trobe University Flora Hill Victoria Australia

8. Department of Psychology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo test ‘Is Insulin Right for Me?’, a theory‐informed, self‐directed, web‐based intervention designed to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes. Further, to examine resource engagement and associations between minimum engagement and outcomes.MethodsDouble‐blind, two‐arm randomised controlled trial (1:1), comparing the intervention with freely available online information (control). Eligible participants were Australian adults with type 2 diabetes, taking oral diabetes medications, recruited primarily via national diabetes registry. Exclusion criteria: prior use of injectable medicines; being ‘very willing’ to commence insulin. Data collections were completed online at baseline, 2‐week and 6‐month follow‐up. Primary outcome: negative insulin treatment appraisal scale (ITAS) scores; secondary outcomes: positive ITAS scores and hypothetical willingness to start insulin. Analyses: intention‐to‐treat (ITT); per‐protocol (PP) examination of outcomes by engagement. Trial registration: ACTRN12621000191897.ResultsNo significant ITT between‐arm (intervention: n = 233; control: n = 243) differences were observed in primary (2 weeks: Mdiff [95% CI]: −1.0 [−2.9 to 0.9]; 6 months: −0.01 [−1.9 to 1.9]), or secondary outcomes at either follow‐up. There was evidence of lower Negative ITAS scores at 2‐week, but not 6‐month, follow‐up among those with minimum intervention engagement (achieved by 44%) compared to no engagement (−2.7 [−5.1 to −0.3]).ConclusionsCompared to existing information, ‘Is insulin right for me?’ did not improve outcomes at either timepoint. Small intervention engagement effects suggest it has potential. Further research is warranted to examine whether effectiveness would be greater in a clinical setting, following timely referral among those for whom insulin is clinically indicated.

Funder

Deakin University

Diabetes Australia

Diabetes Victoria

Sanofi

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3