Time requirements for perioperative glucose management using fully closed‐loop versus standard insulin therapy: A proof‐of‐concept time–motion study

Author:

Roos Jonathan1,Schürch Daniel1,Frei Andreas2,Lagger Sophie1,Schwenkglenks Matthias34,Vogt Andreas5,Herzig David1,Bally Lia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital Bern University Hospital and University of Bern Bern Switzerland

2. Freelance Health Economist Arlesheim Switzerland

3. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI) University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

4. Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM) University of Basel Basel Switzerland

5. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine lnselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo compare the time required for perioperative glucose management using fully automated closed‐loop versus standard insulin therapy.MethodsWe performed a time–motion study to quantify the time requirements for perioperative glucose management with fully closed‐loop (FCL) and standard insulin therapy applied to theoretical scenarios. Following an analysis of workflows in different periods of perioperative care in elective surgery patients receiving FCL or standard insulin therapy upon hospital admission (pre‐ and intra‐operatively, at the intermediate care unit and general wards), the time of process‐specific tasks was measured by shadowing hospital staff. Each task was measured 20 times and its average duration in combination with its frequency according to guidelines was used to calculate the cumulative staff time required for blood glucose management. Cumulative time was calculated for theoretical scenarios consisting of elective minor and major abdominal surgeries (pancreatic surgery and sleeve gastrectomy, respectively) to account for the different care settings and lengths of stay.ResultsThe FCL insulin therapy reduced the time required for perioperative glucose management compared to standard insulin therapy, across all assessed care periods and for both perioperative pathways (range 2.1–4.5). For a major abdominal surgery, total time required was 248.5 min using FCL versus 753.9 min using standard insulin therapy. For a minor abdominal surgery, total time required was 68.6 min and 133.2 min for FCL and standard insulin therapy, respectively.ConclusionsThe use of fully automated closed‐loop insulin delivery for inpatient glucose management has the potential to alleviate the workload of diabetes management in an environment with adequately trained staff.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Maintaining awareness;Diabetic Medicine;2023-08-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3