Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science

Author:

French David P.1ORCID,Ahern Amy L.2,Greaves Colin J.3ORCID,Hawkes Rhiannon E.1ORCID,Higgs Suzanne4,Pechey Rachel5,Sniehotta Falko F.67

Affiliation:

1. Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health University of Manchester Manchester UK

2. MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

3. School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

4. School of Psychology University of Birmingham Birmingham UK

5. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

6. Division of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD) Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany

7. NIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science Newcastle University UK

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe aim of this narrative review was to identify important knowledge gaps in behavioural science relating to type 2 diabetes prevention, to inform future research in the field.MethodsSeven researchers who have published behaviour science research applied to type 2 diabetes prevention independently identified several important gaps in knowledge. They met to discuss these and to generate recommendations to advance research in behavioural science of type 2 diabetes prevention.ResultsA total of 21 overlapping recommendations for a research agenda were identified. These covered issues within the following broad categories: (a) evidencing the impact of whole population approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention, (b) understanding the utility of disease‐specific approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention such as Diabetes Prevention Programmes (DPPs) compared to generic weight loss programmes, (c) identifying how best to increase reach and engagement of DPPs, whilst avoiding exacerbating inequalities, (d) the need to understand mechanism of DPPs, (e) the need to understand how to increase maintenance of changes as part of or following DPPs, (f) the need to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of alternative approaches to the typical self‐regulation approaches that are most commonly used, and (g) the need to address emotional aspects of DPPs, to promote effectiveness and avoid harms.ConclusionsThere is a clear role for behavioural science in informing interventions to prevent people from developing type 2 diabetes, based on strong evidence of reach, effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness. This review identifies key priorities for research needed to improve existing interventions.

Funder

Medical Research Centre

Royal Society

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Reference77 articles.

1. Diabetes in the UK: 2019

2. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)

3. Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose

4. Cost-effectiveness of population-based, community, workplace and individual policies for diabetes prevention in the UK

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).PH38 Type 2 diabetes: Prevention in people at high risk. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Updated September 2017). 2012.https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph38/resources/type‐2‐diabetes‐prevention‐in‐people‐at‐high‐risk‐pdf‐1996304192197

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3