Sandy seeds: Armour or invisibility cloak? Mucilage‐bound sand physically protects seeds from rodents and invertebrates

Author:

LoPresti Eric F.12ORCID,Pan Vincent S.13ORCID,Girvin Cecilia14,Barber Gabhriel1,Jaeger Sierra12,Orrock John L.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plant Biology Oklahoma State University Stillwater Oklahoma USA

2. Department of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA

3. Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA

4. Department of Biology University of California – Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA

5. Department of Integrative Biology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

Abstract Seeds represent a stage of a plant's life cycle that is extremely vulnerable to predation, which unlike most vegetative herbivory, is fatal to the individual. As such, understanding the distribution and abundance of plants may rely on understanding seed defences: characteristics that make seeds more difficult for granivores to locate, less beneficial for granivores to consume or both. Seeds that produce mucilage are widespread, found across many families and species. Although short‐term (single day) studies indicate that mucilage may be a fundamental seed defence found throughout the plant kingdom, it is not clear to what extent mucilage provides long‐term benefits to seeds by reducing granivory. Moreover, it is not clear whether this long‐term defence occurs because mucilage reduces seed apparency as substrate‐coated seeds are more difficult to detect, whether substrate‐coated seeds are less valuable or both. In the first field experiment, we factorially manipulated sand coatings, background sand colour and granivore community using feeding depots to test the mechanistic basis of mucilage‐bound sand as a seed defence against diverse granivores. We found that the sand coating significantly extended chances of seeds remaining over the 101‐day trial, during which rodents were the primary granivores, and our coloration manipulation suggests that the effect was almost entirely physical. We found that whether a seed's sand coating matched its background did not greatly affect chance of removal, leaving the crypsis mechanism unsupported. We conducted a follow‐up field experiment to test the background‐matching hypothesis in more detail, using 20 sand colours and two colours of flax seeds. We again found no support for crypsis, corroborating the finding that mucilage‐bound sand provides a primarily physical defensive benefit. Synthesis. The totality of the results from this and previous studies across granivore taxa and plant species suggests that seed mucilage is a widespread and highly effective physical defence employed by many plants against diverse granivores in many environments

Funder

Oklahoma State University

National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3