No consistencies in abundance–impact relationships across herbaceous invasive species and ecological impact metrics

Author:

Fenesi Annamária12ORCID,Botta‐Dukát Zoltán34ORCID,Miholcsa Zsombor1,Szigeti Viktor45ORCID,Molnár Csaba6,Sándor Dorottya1,Szabó Anna1,Kuhn Thomas1,Kovács‐Hostyánszki Anikó45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology Babeş‐Bolyai University Cluj‐Napoca Romania

2. ELKH‐DE Functional and Restoration Ecology Research Group Debrecen Hungary

3. Large‐scale Vegetation Ecology Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary

4. National Laboratory for Health Security Centre for Ecological Research Budapest Hungary

5. Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary

6. Gömörszőlős Hungary

Abstract

Abstract The general shape (from linear to complex curve), direction (negative and positive) and strength (steepness of the slope) of abundance–impact relationships for different impact metrics are poorly known, despite their importance in understanding and predicting ecological repercussions of invasive species. It is also an open question how the functional traits of invasive species may influence the abundance–impact relationship. We studied 11 widespread herbaceous invasive alien species of East‐Central Europe and their 16 impact metrics (resident plant communities' ecological characteristics, trait composition, functional diversity and soil parameters) by sampling invaded and similar, uninvaded sites (space‐for‐time substitution method). Our aim was to (1) investigate the detailed ecological impacts of invasive plants on native plant communities; (2) explore the type of cover–impact relationships across impact metrics and their consistency across species and (3) study whether the cover–impact relationship depends on functional traits of invasive species. When considering all invasive species together, we found that invaded plant communities were less species rich and less functionally even but showed higher values of Rao's Q diversity index, and higher nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon soil nutrient content compared to uninvaded communities. However, the species‐wise analyses revealed strikingly different impacts among the 11 invasive species and also among impact metrics. Regarding the type of cover–impact relationships, we found no consistencies across invasive species and impact metrics. Still, nonlinear relationships prevailed when species were analysed together and linear relationships when species were studied individually. The functional traits of the invasive species explained only a small part of this response heterogeneity; mostly, the small‐seeded perennial invasive species affected the cover–species richness relationship. Synthesis: Herbaceous invasive plant species have a cover‐dependent impact on resident plant communities, but there are no consistent patterns across impact metrics and invasive species. Specific traits or trait syndrome of invasive species may affect the heterogeneity of cover–impact relationships, but that would need further study. We highlighted the importance of impact assessments involving invasive species' abundance to unmask cryptic impacts for species that show contrasting effects along an abundance gradient.

Funder

National Research, Development and Innovation Office

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3