Adequacy of thyroid hormone replacement for people with hypothyroidism in real‐world settings: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies

Author:

Efthymiadis Agathoklis1ORCID,Henry Matthew2,Spinos Dimitrios3,Bourlaki Marianthi4,Tsikopoulos Alexandros5,Bourazana Angeliki6,Bastounis Anastasios7,Tsikopoulos Konstantinos8

Affiliation:

1. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Oxford UK

2. Bodleian Health Care Libraries University of Oxford Oxford UK

3. Gloucester NHS Foundation Trust Gloucester UK

4. Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust Birmingham UK

5. 1st Department of Otorhinolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Kiriakidi 1 Thessaloniki Greece

6. 2nd Department of Cardiology University Hospital of Larissa Larissa Greece

7. School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

8. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThyroid hormone under‐replacement and over‐replacement are associated with adverse health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the extent of thyroid hormone replacement adequacy for patients with known hypothyroidism in real‐word settings, excluding those receiving thyroid hormone suppressive therapy as thyroid cancer treatment.DesignFour electronic databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for published and unpublished observational studies until 12 December 2022. The results of the studies were meta‐analysed to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for thyroid hormone supplementation adequacy, over‐replacement and under‐replacement. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the Joanna‐Briggs appraisal tool for prevalence studies.ResultsSeven studies with a total of 4230 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence estimates of adequate thyroid replacement, over‐replacement and under‐replacement were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.60, p = .001), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.27, p = .001) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13–0.36, p = .001), respectively. Four studies subclassified hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism into overt and subclinical. The pooled prevalence of overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00–0.11, p = .01) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09–0.27 p = .001), respectively. For overt and subclinical hypothyroidism, the pooled prevalence was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01–0.03, p = .001) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12–0.29, p = .001), respectively.ConclusionsOn average, approximately half of patients with hypothyroidism are only treated to target euthyroidism. In real‐world practice, a significant number of patients are over‐treated or under‐treated, leading to adverse healthcare outcomes. It is imperative that more effective thyroid monitoring strategies be implemented, with an emphasis on primary care thyroid function monitoring, to minimise inappropriate thyroid replacement treatments and optimise healthcare outcomes at a population level.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Endocrinology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3