Shoreline restoration including armor removal and log placement affect ecosystem recovery through time

Author:

Des Roches Simone12ORCID,Accola Kerry L.1,Faulkner Hannah S.2,Morgan Jason R.3,Perla Bianca S.4,Metler Maria4,Dethier Megan N.5,Toft Jason D.1

Affiliation:

1. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Fishery Sciences Building, 1122 NE Boat Street Seattle WA 98105 U.S.A.

2. Habitat Program Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 1111 Washington Street SE Olympia WA 98501 U.S.A.

3. Northwest Straits Foundation 1155 N State Street STE 400 Bellingham WA 98225 U.S.A.

4. Vashon Nature Center PO Box 2522 Vashon 98070 WA U.S.A.

5. Friday Harbor Laboratories University of Washington 620 University Road, Friday Harbor Seattle WA 98250 U.S.A.

Abstract

The impacts of individual restoration activities, such as the total area covered and specific actions taken, can be difficult to measure because they are typically not performed randomly or independently. In Puget Sound, Washington, United States, removal of hard armor is a primary shoreline restoration measure. The length of armor removed from a beach and additional restoration actions implemented can vary considerably. As such, it is challenging to attribute specific ecological responses to particular actions. We use an extensive collection of sites regularly monitored pre‐ and post‐restoration to explore the success of different extents of armor removal and three supplemental “living shoreline” restoration actions: native vegetation planting, log placement, and sediment supplementation (“nourishment”). We measured five ecological response variables: sediments (percent surface, subsurface gravel), beach logs (count, line width), beach wrack (percent cover, depth), riparian vegetation (percent cover of supratidal, backshore), and supratidal invertebrates (density, richness). Only beach logs were affected by the length of armor removed, whereas wrack increased regardless of length. Invertebrate abundance increased through time only when supplemental vegetation planting did not occur. Placement of logs post armor removal was an impactful supplemental restoration strategy, positively affecting not only the further accumulation of logs, but also the amount of wrack and gravel sediments. Sediment nourishment only affected the proportion of subsurface gravel, which decreased through time in nourished sites. We stress the importance of the thorough monitoring of the ecological effects of living shoreline restoration actions to better understand their role in ecosystem recovery through time.

Funder

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3