Bariatric surgery stigma from the perspective of patients: A scoping review

Author:

Garcia Franshelis K.1ORCID,Mulder Bob C.2,Hazebroek Eric J.34,Koelen Maria A.1,Veen Esther J.56,Verkooijen Kirsten T.1

Affiliation:

1. Health and Society, Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands

2. Strategic Communication, Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands

3. Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands

4. Department of Bariatric Surgery, Vitalys Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem The Netherlands

5. Rural Sociology, Department of Social Sciences Wageningen University Wageningen The Netherlands

6. Aeres University of Applied Science Almere The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo explore the experiences and consequences of bariatric surgery stigma from the perspective of bariatric surgery patients and to identify knowledge gaps in the literature.DesignA scoping review.Data SourcesStudies published between December 2002 and January 2022 were identified from the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and MEDLINE.Review MethodsWe screened 3092 records and included 28 studies. Findings were grouped thematically using the health stigma discrimination framework.ResultsPatients experienced several types of stigmas, including perceived, experienced, anticipated and internalized stigma, related to undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients were confronted with negative comments and judgement from others when they disclosed their decision to have surgery or when they revealed that they had undergone surgery. These experiences led to conflicts in the decision‐making process, such as delaying the choice for surgery, seeking surgery abroad or opting out. Patients who internalized stigma often reported feelings of shame and embarrassment for choosing surgery and felt the need for secrecy or selective disclosure. Stigma experiences were influenced by gender and differed between different subgroups of patients.ConclusionThe stigma surrounding bariatric surgery has detrimental consequences for eligible individuals and bariatric surgery patients. However, the evidence from patients' perspective remains limited. More research into patient's experiences is needed to improve patient care and further educate healthcare professionals. In addition, to better understand the nature and implications of bariatric surgery stigma, future research should be founded on stigma theories and distinguish between the different types of stigmas.ImpactThis scoping review contributes to a better understanding of the implications the stigma surrounding bariatric surgery has for bariatric surgery patients before and after surgery. The knowledge generated by this review can inform improvements in the education and management of people living with obesity and bariatric surgery patients.Reporting MethodThe scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution.Protocol RegistrationA protocol was not registered for this scoping review.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3